Vascular Medicine

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Francis, C. W
Right arrow Articles by Suchkova, V. N
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Francis, C. W
Right arrow Articles by Suchkova, V. N
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Vascular Medicine, Vol. 6, No. 3, 181-187 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/1358836X0100600309

Ultrasound and thrombolysis

Charles W Francis

Vascular Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine & Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA, charlesFfrancis{at}urmc.rochester.edu

Valentina N Suchkova

Vascular Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine & Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA

Thrombolytic therapy and mechanical interventions are frequently used in the treatment of both arterial and venous thrombotic disease. Limitations to these approaches include failure to achieve reperfusion and complications including bleeding and vessel wall damage. Increasing evidence indicates that the use of ultrasound offers potential therapeutic advantages. This review considers two distinct approaches which include the use of high intensity ultra-sound to mechanically fragment clots and also the use of low intensity ultrasound to augment enzymatic fibrinolysis. High intensity ultrasound can be delivered via catheter or transcutaneously to disrupt clots in vitro or in animal models into small fragments. Initial clinical studies demonstrate potential clinical value in peripheral and coronary arterial thrombosis and occluded saphenous vein bypass grafts treated with the catheter approach. Studies in vitro indicate that low intensity ultrasound accelerates enzymatic thrombolysis through non-thermal mechanisms involving improvement in drug transport. The effect is larger at low frequencies, which also offer better tissue penetration and less heating. The ability to accelerate thrombolysis has been confirmed in animal models demonstrating markedly increased reperfusion and minimal toxicity. The use of ultrasound to mechanically disrupt occlusive thrombi or to accelerate enzymatic thrombolysis offers a new approach to treating occlusive thrombotic disease.

Key Words: deep vein thrombosis • fibrinolysis • peripheral arterial disease • streptokinase • thrombolysis • tissue plasminogen activator • ultrasound


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. J. Siegel, V. N. Suchkova, T. Miyamoto, H. Luo, R. B. Baggs, Y. Neuman, M. Horzewski, V. Suorsa, S. Kobal, T. Thompson, et al.
Ultrasound energy improves myocardial perfusion in the presence of coronary occlusion
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 6, 2004; 44(7): 1454 - 1458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. V. Joffe and S. Z. Goldhaber
Upper-Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis
Circulation, October 1, 2002; 106(14): 1874 - 1880.
[Full Text] [PDF]